Emerson Worst - Learning to Love The Thunderhead

 Emerson Worst - Learning to Love The Thunderhead

    April 27th 2026

    If you've ever heard of the Scythe franchise by Neal Shusterman, you've probably heard about the Thunderhead. It is the sentient, all powerful AI that governs the world and watches over each and every human that resides in it. It is a thought that many find to be scary, about humanity not making our own choices anymore, at the mercy of an AI who doesn't understand humanity, but Scythe presents a different perspective. The Thunderhead is very human, and does it's best to rule Earth, while ensuring humans have as many choices as possible.
    This is made very evident in the moment that essentially forms what Scythe is known for. When humanity conquers death and becomes immortal, everyone looks to the Thunderhead for a solution. However, the AI decides that it will harm its creators. This is then built upon in the sequel to Scythe, aptly named Thunderhead.
    Here we can see through various logs made by the Thunderhead, that it really is as benevolent as it's made out to be. It deeply cares about the hold it holds in its metaphorical hand, and through all its logs and records, we see how it experiments with its power, allowing humans to make the decision without even knowing it. Like in one of the districts where the Thunderhead has absolutely no surveillance. In its own words, (or close to them,) "If humanity improves in areas of lesser surveillance, I see no reason why I should remove most if not all my surveillance around the world."
    This is what I hope the future of AI to be. In Scythe, the Thunderhead is everything that makes up humanity. Not just the intellect and wisdom, but the compassion and empathy inside each of our hearts. It is an accumulation of all of humanity, by the purest definition.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kip Redick Example of a blog post 1

  I just had a few thoughts on what "wilderness of the soul" meant. In class we discussed that it meant uncharted territory within yourself and I thought of Freud's Iceberg analogy where most of the hidden unconscious is the part of the iceberg that remains underwater. There had always been a debate between psychology and religion in regards to what exactly a soul is. Some would say that the soul is the consciousness of the human brain, while others argue it is something spiritual linking us to God. But in response to the wilderness aspect, I do wonder how much of ourselves do we not actually know? I have always thought of myself as someone who knows exactly who I am, but since this class discussion I'm not so sure. Don't get me wrong- I am not upset about this, but I am certainly more curious. It's almost exciting to think about what else I could learn about myself, but also slightly nerve-wracking. What if I learn something new that I don't ...
Read more

Kip Redick Introduction

 Welcome to the Heroes and Mystics blog for 2026. Make sure to start the blog with your name and the subject of the entry (Just as I have done with this post). . Blog entries will be considered informal writing assignments and as such will be graded more in relation to content than style. Blog entries will contain questions and answers to questions, as well as reflections that relate to daily classroom discussions, completion of exercises, and reading assignments. Any questions the student has while reading or completing assignments should be written in their blog. Reflections may relate to connections the student makes between discussions in this class and those in other classes, between arguments raised in the readings in this class and those raised in other classes or from informal conversations. Students are encouraged to apply the ideas learned in this class to activities that take place outside of the class. These applications make great reflections. The studen...
Read more

Kip Redick Example of a blog post 2

  Page 4 Michael Taussig would suggest Juan's understanding of the meaning of a place emerges out of the process of an imitation of all the “differences” that we discern there. We mimic (in language and action) the full range of sounds, movements, and other sensory perceptions that come to us from the more than human world.” It’s hard to put a place that strikes us as sublime into mere words; we can try to describe it as a feeling and try to put language to that feeling, but sometimes the feeling of the beauty of nature or the power of a sacred space is too big to try to translate or make sense of. Would every place and experience be subjective, and would the discourse be the same? Would the mountain top make me feel the same as another? Or does my personal experience with the natural world and divine keep it intimate/ unique, or would my experience be relatable enough? The author uses the messiness, ambiguity, and mystery of people's deeply personal experience o...
Read more