Ethan Persaud - Divine Love and Human Truth in Julian of Norwich

One of the most challenging readings of the semester for me was Julian of Norwich’s Revelations of Divine Love. Something that stood out to me most was the way Julian approaches truth as something not purely objective, but as something deeply tied to human experience and response. I connect this idea to the class discussion we had about truth versus reality. Reality is what exists, but the truth is the way humans respond to it and how we as people interpret what is real. Julian’s visions are not written as scientific explanations of the world, but rather as spiritual reflections on suffering and love. This made me realize that many religious and mythical texts aren’t concerned with factual explanation and more focused on meaning. While I am not Christian, I am Hindu and I am quite familiar with religious texts from Hinduism such as the Ramayana and Bhagavad Gita. These texts are not scientific explanations of how things happen and why we should believe in them, but focused on simply sharing something human. They tell stories that revolve around values that people should hold dear to them, not just Hindus, but all humans. Things like devotion, love, compassion, dedication, are all things that are focused in these texts that are the key takeaways, not something scientific. Julian’s writing helps transform pain and uncertainty into something understandable through faith, very similar to the Hindu texts that I described. To me, I found this especially meaningful because it mirrors how people often process difficult moments in their life. We might not always have a detailed understanding of why things happen the way they do, but we still try to assign meaning to it. This reading helped me see that truth is often something personal and human. It isn’t always about proving facts, but about making sense of lived experience.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kip Redick Example of a blog post 1

  I just had a few thoughts on what "wilderness of the soul" meant. In class we discussed that it meant uncharted territory within yourself and I thought of Freud's Iceberg analogy where most of the hidden unconscious is the part of the iceberg that remains underwater. There had always been a debate between psychology and religion in regards to what exactly a soul is. Some would say that the soul is the consciousness of the human brain, while others argue it is something spiritual linking us to God. But in response to the wilderness aspect, I do wonder how much of ourselves do we not actually know? I have always thought of myself as someone who knows exactly who I am, but since this class discussion I'm not so sure. Don't get me wrong- I am not upset about this, but I am certainly more curious. It's almost exciting to think about what else I could learn about myself, but also slightly nerve-wracking. What if I learn something new that I don't ...
Read more

Kip Redick Introduction

 Welcome to the Heroes and Mystics blog for 2026. Make sure to start the blog with your name and the subject of the entry (Just as I have done with this post). . Blog entries will be considered informal writing assignments and as such will be graded more in relation to content than style. Blog entries will contain questions and answers to questions, as well as reflections that relate to daily classroom discussions, completion of exercises, and reading assignments. Any questions the student has while reading or completing assignments should be written in their blog. Reflections may relate to connections the student makes between discussions in this class and those in other classes, between arguments raised in the readings in this class and those raised in other classes or from informal conversations. Students are encouraged to apply the ideas learned in this class to activities that take place outside of the class. These applications make great reflections. The studen...
Read more

Kip Redick Example of a blog post 2

  Page 4 Michael Taussig would suggest Juan's understanding of the meaning of a place emerges out of the process of an imitation of all the “differences” that we discern there. We mimic (in language and action) the full range of sounds, movements, and other sensory perceptions that come to us from the more than human world.” It’s hard to put a place that strikes us as sublime into mere words; we can try to describe it as a feeling and try to put language to that feeling, but sometimes the feeling of the beauty of nature or the power of a sacred space is too big to try to translate or make sense of. Would every place and experience be subjective, and would the discourse be the same? Would the mountain top make me feel the same as another? Or does my personal experience with the natural world and divine keep it intimate/ unique, or would my experience be relatable enough? The author uses the messiness, ambiguity, and mystery of people's deeply personal experience o...
Read more